Is CITY OF MARQUEZ required to publish a Consumer Confidence Report?

Yes. CITY OF MARQUEZ is a community water system, and federal rules (40 CFR 141 Subpart O) require every community water system to publish a Consumer Confidence Report each year.

When is CITY OF MARQUEZ’s next Consumer Confidence Report due?

CITY OF MARQUEZ’s next Consumer Confidence Report is due by July 1, 2027. The report covers calendar year 2026.

What is a Consumer Confidence Report?

A Consumer Confidence Report (CCR) is the annual drinking water quality report that community water systems must provide to the people they serve. It lists the contaminants detected in the system’s water during the year, where the water comes from, and how the results compare with federal limits. EPA’s revised CCR rule takes effect January 1, 2027, and the first reports in the new format are due July 1, 2027.

MARQUEZ, TX · Leon County

CITY OF MARQUEZ Water System

Consumer Confidence Report status

CITY OF MARQUEZ must publish a Consumer Confidence Report — the annual drinking water quality report covering calendar year 2026 — by July 1, 2027.

As of August 1, 2026, EPA's federal records show no open violations for CITY OF MARQUEZ.

Data sourced from the EPA ECHO database (SDWA bulk download), last refreshed August 1, 2026. This is a record-keeping and public-information tool — it does not replace Texas’s official records. Always confirm current status with Texas before making decisions based on this information.

System facts

System ID (PWSID): TX1450009
System type: Community Water System
Population served: 290
Service connections: 191
Ownership: local government
Water source: groundwater (wells)

CITY OF MARQUEZ is one of 4,188 community water systems in Texas in the 500 or fewer people size category, serving 290 people from groundwater.

As of August 1, 2026, its federal record holds 9 entries between 2004 and 2013, all of which EPA lists as closed. Nothing has been added since 2013.

All 9 are monitoring and reporting requirements — the category that accounts for about four in five of all violations in EPA's national dataset — rather than findings about the water itself. The record involves the Stage 1 Disinfectants and Disinfection Byproducts Rule and the Lead and Copper Rule.

Violation history

Lead Consumer Notice
—
Lead and Copper Rule
December 30, 2013 – October 18, 2016
Resolved
Monitoring and Reporting (DBP)
—
Chlorine
October 1, 2006 – December 31, 2006
Resolved
Monitoring and Reporting (DBP)
—
Chlorine
July 1, 2006 – September 30, 2006
Resolved
Monitoring and Reporting (DBP)
—
Chlorine
April 1, 2006 – June 30, 2006
Resolved
Monitoring and Reporting (DBP)
—
Chlorine
July 1, 2005 – September 30, 2005
Resolved
Monitoring and Reporting (DBP)
—
Chlorine
January 1, 2005 – March 31, 2005
Resolved
Monitoring and Reporting (DBP)
—
Chlorine
July 1, 2004 – September 30, 2004
Resolved
Monitoring and Reporting (DBP)
—
Chlorine
April 1, 2004 – June 30, 2004
Resolved
Monitoring and Reporting (DBP)
—
Chlorine
January 1, 2004 – March 31, 2004
Resolved

Resolved addressed and confirmed by the state

Period	Violation	Contaminant / rule	Health-based	Status
December 30, 2013 – October 18, 2016	Lead Consumer Notice	Lead and Copper Rule	—	Resolved
October 1, 2006 – December 31, 2006	Monitoring and Reporting (DBP)	Chlorine	—	Resolved
July 1, 2006 – September 30, 2006	Monitoring and Reporting (DBP)	Chlorine	—	Resolved
April 1, 2006 – June 30, 2006	Monitoring and Reporting (DBP)	Chlorine	—	Resolved
July 1, 2005 – September 30, 2005	Monitoring and Reporting (DBP)	Chlorine	—	Resolved
January 1, 2005 – March 31, 2005	Monitoring and Reporting (DBP)	Chlorine	—	Resolved
July 1, 2004 – September 30, 2004	Monitoring and Reporting (DBP)	Chlorine	—	Resolved
April 1, 2004 – June 30, 2004	Monitoring and Reporting (DBP)	Chlorine	—	Resolved
January 1, 2004 – March 31, 2004	Monitoring and Reporting (DBP)	Chlorine	—	Resolved

Resolved addressed and confirmed by the state

Enforcement actions

November 5, 2013State Compliance achieved19 linked violations
July 19, 2007State Public Notification requested15 linked violations
July 19, 2007State Public Notification requested2 linked violations
July 19, 2007State Public Notification requested1 linked violation
July 19, 2007State Public Notification requested2 linked violations
July 19, 2007State Public Notification requested1 linked violation
July 19, 2007State Public Notification requested2 linked violations
July 19, 2007State Public Notification requested1 linked violation
July 19, 2007State Public Notification requested1 linked violation
July 19, 2007State Public Notification requested1 linked violation
July 19, 2007State Public Notification requested1 linked violation
July 19, 2007State Violation/Reminder Notice1 linked violation
July 19, 2007State Violation/Reminder Notice1 linked violation
July 19, 2007State Violation/Reminder Notice1 linked violation
July 19, 2007State Violation/Reminder Notice1 linked violation
July 19, 2007State Violation/Reminder Notice1 linked violation
July 19, 2007State Violation/Reminder Notice1 linked violation
July 19, 2007State Violation/Reminder Notice1 linked violation
July 19, 2007State Violation/Reminder Notice1 linked violation
July 19, 2007State Violation/Reminder Notice1 linked violation
July 19, 2007State Violation/Reminder Notice1 linked violation
July 19, 2007State Violation/Reminder Notice1 linked violation
July 19, 2007State Violation/Reminder Notice1 linked violation
July 19, 2007State Violation/Reminder Notice1 linked violation
June 1, 1985State Formal Notice of Violation issuedgeneral compliance action — not tied to a specific violation on record
April 1, 1985State Formal Notice of Violation issuedgeneral compliance action — not tied to a specific violation on record
April 1, 1984State Public Notification receivedgeneral compliance action — not tied to a specific violation on record
December 1, 1983State Public Notification receivedgeneral compliance action — not tied to a specific violation on record
November 1, 1983State Public Notification receivedgeneral compliance action — not tied to a specific violation on record
October 1, 1983State Public Notification receivedgeneral compliance action — not tied to a specific violation on record
September 1, 1983State Public Notification receivedgeneral compliance action — not tied to a specific violation on record
July 1, 1983State Public Notification receivedgeneral compliance action — not tied to a specific violation on record
May 1, 1983State Public Notification receivedgeneral compliance action — not tied to a specific violation on record
March 1, 1983State Public Notification received1 linked violation
October 1, 1982State Public Notification receivedgeneral compliance action — not tied to a specific violation on record
September 1, 1982State Public Notification receivedgeneral compliance action — not tied to a specific violation on record
August 1, 1982State Public Notification receivedgeneral compliance action — not tied to a specific violation on record
July 1, 1982State Public Notification receivedgeneral compliance action — not tied to a specific violation on record
June 1, 1982State Public Notification receivedgeneral compliance action — not tied to a specific violation on record
May 1, 1982State Public Notification receivedgeneral compliance action — not tied to a specific violation on record
April 1, 1982State Public Notification receivedgeneral compliance action — not tied to a specific violation on record
March 1, 1982State Public Notification receivedgeneral compliance action — not tied to a specific violation on record
November 1, 1981State Public Notification receivedgeneral compliance action — not tied to a specific violation on record
August 1, 1981State Public Notification receivedgeneral compliance action — not tied to a specific violation on record
July 1, 1981State Public Notification receivedgeneral compliance action — not tied to a specific violation on record
May 1, 1981State Public Notification receivedgeneral compliance action — not tied to a specific violation on record
March 1, 1981State Public Notification receivedgeneral compliance action — not tied to a specific violation on record
February 1, 1981State Public Notification receivedgeneral compliance action — not tied to a specific violation on record
January 1, 1981State Public Notification receivedgeneral compliance action — not tied to a specific violation on record
December 1, 1980State Public Notification receivedgeneral compliance action — not tied to a specific violation on record
November 1, 1980State Public Notification received1 linked violation
October 1, 1980State Public Notification receivedgeneral compliance action — not tied to a specific violation on record
September 1, 1980Federal issued Formal Notice of Violationgeneral compliance action — not tied to a specific violation on record
August 1, 1980Federal issued Formal Notice of Violationgeneral compliance action — not tied to a specific violation on record
July 1, 1980Federal issued Formal Notice of Violationgeneral compliance action — not tied to a specific violation on record
June 1, 1980Federal issued Formal Notice of Violationgeneral compliance action — not tied to a specific violation on record
May 1, 1980Federal issued Formal Notice of Violationgeneral compliance action — not tied to a specific violation on record
April 1, 1980Federal issued Formal Notice of Violationgeneral compliance action — not tied to a specific violation on record
February 1, 1980Federal issued Formal Notice of Violationgeneral compliance action — not tied to a specific violation on record
December 1, 1979Federal issued Formal Notice of Violationgeneral compliance action — not tied to a specific violation on record
November 1, 1979Federal issued Formal Notice of Violationgeneral compliance action — not tied to a specific violation on record
October 1, 1979Federal issued Formal Notice of Violationgeneral compliance action — not tied to a specific violation on record

Common questions

Is CITY OF MARQUEZ required to publish a Consumer Confidence Report?: Yes. CITY OF MARQUEZ is a community water system, and federal rules (40 CFR 141 Subpart O) require every community water system to publish a Consumer Confidence Report each year.
When is CITY OF MARQUEZ’s next Consumer Confidence Report due?: CITY OF MARQUEZ’s next Consumer Confidence Report is due by July 1, 2027. The report covers calendar year 2026.
Does CITY OF MARQUEZ have any open drinking water violations on record?: As of August 1, 2026, EPA's federal records show no open violations for CITY OF MARQUEZ.
What is a Consumer Confidence Report?: A Consumer Confidence Report (CCR) is the annual drinking water quality report that community water systems must provide to the people they serve. It lists the contaminants detected in the system’s water during the year, where the water comes from, and how the results compare with federal limits. EPA’s revised CCR rule takes effect January 1, 2027, and the first reports in the new format are due July 1, 2027.

Contact

CLARY, STYNETTE

903-529-3020

MARQUEZ, TX 77865-0085