Is CITY OF OLIVE BRANCH required to publish a Consumer Confidence Report?

Yes. CITY OF OLIVE BRANCH is a community water system, and federal rules (40 CFR 141 Subpart O) require every community water system to publish a Consumer Confidence Report each year.

When is CITY OF OLIVE BRANCH’s next Consumer Confidence Report due?

CITY OF OLIVE BRANCH’s next Consumer Confidence Report is due by July 1, 2027. The report covers calendar year 2026.

What is a Consumer Confidence Report?

A Consumer Confidence Report (CCR) is the annual drinking water quality report that community water systems must provide to the people they serve. It lists the contaminants detected in the system’s water during the year, where the water comes from, and how the results compare with federal limits. EPA’s revised CCR rule takes effect January 1, 2027, and the first reports in the new format are due July 1, 2027.

OLIVE BRANCH, MS · DeSoto County

CITY OF OLIVE BRANCH Water System

Consumer Confidence Report status

CITY OF OLIVE BRANCH must publish a Consumer Confidence Report — the annual drinking water quality report covering calendar year 2026 — by July 1, 2027.

As of August 1, 2026, EPA's federal records show no open violations for CITY OF OLIVE BRANCH.

Data sourced from the EPA ECHO database (SDWA bulk download), last refreshed August 1, 2026. This is a record-keeping and public-information tool — it does not replace Mississippi’s official records. Always confirm current status with Mississippi before making decisions based on this information.

System facts

System ID (PWSID): MS0170015
System type: Community Water System
Population served: 54,025
Service connections: 20,464
Ownership: local government
Water source: groundwater (wells)

CITY OF OLIVE BRANCH is the fourth largest community water system in Mississippi, serving 54,025 people from groundwater.

As of August 1, 2026, its federal record holds 7 entries between 2007 and 2024, all of which EPA lists as closed.

Of the 7, 6 are monitoring and reporting requirements — the category that accounts for about four in five of all violations in EPA's national dataset — rather than findings about the water itself. The record involves the Radionuclides and Revised Rad Rule and the Stage 2 Disinfectants and Disinfection Byproducts Rule.

Violation history

Monitoring and Reporting (DBP)
—
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)
January 1, 2024 – December 31, 2024
Archived
Monitoring and Reporting (DBP)
—
TTHM
January 1, 2024 – December 31, 2024
Archived
Maximum Contaminant Level Violation, Single Sample
Health-based
Combined Radium (-226 and -228)
January 1, 2010 – August 3, 2018
Resolved
Monitoring, Regular
—
Combined Radium (-226 and -228)
July 1, 2008 – September 30, 2008
Resolved
Monitoring, Regular
—
Gross Alpha, Excl. Radon and U
April 1, 2008 – June 30, 2008
Resolved
Monitoring, Regular
—
Gross Alpha, Excl. Radon and U
October 1, 2007 – December 31, 2007
Resolved
Monitoring, Regular
—
Combined Radium (-226 and -228)
July 1, 2007 – September 30, 2007
Resolved

Archived closed in EPA's records (typically due to age or a data correction)Resolved addressed and confirmed by the state

Period	Violation	Contaminant / rule	Health-based	Status
January 1, 2024 – December 31, 2024	Monitoring and Reporting (DBP)	Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)	—	Archived
January 1, 2024 – December 31, 2024	Monitoring and Reporting (DBP)	TTHM	—	Archived
January 1, 2010 – August 3, 2018	Maximum Contaminant Level Violation, Single Sample	Combined Radium (-226 and -228)	Health-based	Resolved
July 1, 2008 – September 30, 2008	Monitoring, Regular	Combined Radium (-226 and -228)	—	Resolved
April 1, 2008 – June 30, 2008	Monitoring, Regular	Gross Alpha, Excl. Radon and U	—	Resolved
October 1, 2007 – December 31, 2007	Monitoring, Regular	Gross Alpha, Excl. Radon and U	—	Resolved
July 1, 2007 – September 30, 2007	Monitoring, Regular	Combined Radium (-226 and -228)	—	Resolved

Archived closed in EPA's records (typically due to age or a data correction)Resolved addressed and confirmed by the state

Enforcement actions

March 13, 2025State no additional Formal Action needed2 linked violations
March 13, 2025State no additional Formal Action needed2 linked violations
January 14, 2025State no additional Formal Action neededgeneral compliance action — not tied to a specific violation on record
January 7, 2025State Compliance achievedgeneral compliance action — not tied to a specific violation on record
January 3, 2025State Public Notification requestedgeneral compliance action — not tied to a specific violation on record
August 3, 2018State Compliance achieved1 linked violation
July 25, 2018State Compliance achieved1 linked violation
July 25, 2018State Public Notification received1 linked violation
July 24, 2018State Formal Notice of Violation issued1 linked violation
July 24, 2018State Public Notification requested1 linked violation
May 14, 2018State Formal Notice of Violation issued1 linked violation
May 14, 2018State Public Notification requested1 linked violation
June 30, 2010State Public Notification received2 linked violations
February 5, 2010State Formal Notice of Violation issued1 linked violation
February 5, 2010State Public Notification requested1 linked violation
June 23, 2009State Public Notification received18 linked violations
June 23, 2009State Public Notification received21 linked violations
June 23, 2009State Public Notification received18 linked violations
June 23, 2009State Public Notification received18 linked violations
June 23, 2009State Public Notification received18 linked violations
June 23, 2009State Public Notification received15 linked violations
June 23, 2009State Public Notification received15 linked violations
June 23, 2009State Public Notification received12 linked violations
June 23, 2009State Public Notification received15 linked violations
June 23, 2009State Public Notification received15 linked violations
June 23, 2009State Public Notification received15 linked violations
December 30, 2008State Compliance achieved32 linked violations
December 30, 2008State Compliance achieved30 linked violations
November 17, 2008State Formal Notice of Violation issued77 linked violations

Common questions

Is CITY OF OLIVE BRANCH required to publish a Consumer Confidence Report?: Yes. CITY OF OLIVE BRANCH is a community water system, and federal rules (40 CFR 141 Subpart O) require every community water system to publish a Consumer Confidence Report each year.
When is CITY OF OLIVE BRANCH’s next Consumer Confidence Report due?: CITY OF OLIVE BRANCH’s next Consumer Confidence Report is due by July 1, 2027. The report covers calendar year 2026.
Does CITY OF OLIVE BRANCH have any open drinking water violations on record?: As of August 1, 2026, EPA's federal records show no open violations for CITY OF OLIVE BRANCH.
What is a Consumer Confidence Report?: A Consumer Confidence Report (CCR) is the annual drinking water quality report that community water systems must provide to the people they serve. It lists the contaminants detected in the system’s water during the year, where the water comes from, and how the results compare with federal limits. EPA’s revised CCR rule takes effect January 1, 2027, and the first reports in the new format are due July 1, 2027.

Contact

ADAMS, KEN

662-892-9201

OLIVE BRANCH, MS 38654