Is TOMOKA VIEW ESTATES required to publish a Consumer Confidence Report?

Yes. TOMOKA VIEW ESTATES is a community water system, and federal rules (40 CFR 141 Subpart O) require every community water system to publish a Consumer Confidence Report each year.

When is TOMOKA VIEW ESTATES’s next Consumer Confidence Report due?

TOMOKA VIEW ESTATES’s next Consumer Confidence Report is due by July 1, 2027. The report covers calendar year 2026.

What is a Consumer Confidence Report?

A Consumer Confidence Report (CCR) is the annual drinking water quality report that community water systems must provide to the people they serve. It lists the contaminants detected in the system’s water during the year, where the water comes from, and how the results compare with federal limits. EPA’s revised CCR rule takes effect January 1, 2027, and the first reports in the new format are due July 1, 2027.

ORLANDO, FL · Volusia County

TOMOKA VIEW ESTATES Water System

Consumer Confidence Report status

TOMOKA VIEW ESTATES must publish a Consumer Confidence Report — the annual drinking water quality report covering calendar year 2026 — by July 1, 2027.

As of August 1, 2026, EPA's federal records show no open violations for TOMOKA VIEW ESTATES.

Data sourced from the EPA ECHO database (SDWA bulk download), last refreshed August 1, 2026. This is a record-keeping and public-information tool — it does not replace Florida’s official records. Always confirm current status with Florida before making decisions based on this information.

System facts

System ID (PWSID): FL3641373
System type: Community Water System
Population served: 478
Service connections: 191
Ownership: privately owned
Water source: groundwater (wells)

TOMOKA VIEW ESTATES is one of 3,067 community water systems in Florida in the 500 or fewer people size category, serving 478 people from groundwater.

As of August 1, 2026, its federal record holds 20 entries between 1998 and 2009, all of which EPA lists as closed. Nothing has been added since 2009.

Of the 20, 5 are monitoring and reporting requirements — the category that accounts for about four in five of all violations in EPA's national dataset — rather than findings about the water itself. The record involves the Stage 1 Disinfectants and Disinfection Byproducts Rule, the Lead and Copper Rule, and the Consumer Confidence Rule.

Violation history

Maximum Contaminant Level Violation, Average
Health-based
TTHM
July 1, 2009 – September 30, 2009
Resolved
Maximum Contaminant Level Violation, Average
Health-based
TTHM
April 1, 2009 – June 30, 2009
Resolved
Follow-up Or Routine LCR Tap M/R
—
Lead and Copper Rule
January 1, 2009 – June 30, 2017
Resolved
Maximum Contaminant Level Violation, Average
Health-based
TTHM
January 1, 2009 – March 31, 2009
Resolved
Maximum Contaminant Level Violation, Monthly (TCR)
Health-based
Coliform (TCR)
September 1, 2007 – September 30, 2007
Archived
Maximum Contaminant Level Violation, Average
Health-based
TTHM
January 1, 2007 – March 31, 2007
Resolved
Monitoring and Reporting (DBP)
—
TTHM
July 1, 2006 – September 30, 2006
Resolved
Maximum Contaminant Level Violation, Average
Health-based
TTHM
July 1, 2006 – September 30, 2006
Resolved
Monitoring and Reporting (DBP)
—
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)
July 1, 2006 – September 30, 2006
Resolved
Maximum Contaminant Level Violation, Average
Health-based
TTHM
April 1, 2006 – June 30, 2006
Resolved
Maximum Contaminant Level Violation, Average
Health-based
TTHM
January 1, 2006 – March 31, 2006
Resolved
Maximum Contaminant Level Violation, Average
Health-based
TTHM
October 1, 2005 – December 31, 2005
Resolved
Maximum Contaminant Level Violation, Average
Health-based
TTHM
July 1, 2005 – September 30, 2005
Resolved
Maximum Contaminant Level Violation, Average
Health-based
TTHM
April 1, 2005 – June 30, 2005
Resolved
Maximum Contaminant Level Violation, Average
Health-based
TTHM
January 1, 2005 – March 31, 2005
Resolved
Follow-up Or Routine LCR Tap M/R
—
Lead and Copper Rule
January 1, 2005 – June 30, 2017
Resolved
Maximum Contaminant Level Violation, Average
Health-based
TTHM
October 1, 2004 – December 31, 2004
Resolved
Consumer Confidence Report Inadequate Reporting
—
Consumer Confidence Rule
July 1, 2002 – July 21, 2013
Resolved
Consumer Confidence Report Complete Failure to Report
—
Consumer Confidence Rule
October 19, 1999 – July 21, 2013
Resolved
Monitoring, Regular
—
Nitrate
January 1, 1998 – December 31, 1998
Archived

Resolved addressed and confirmed by the stateArchived closed in EPA's records (typically due to age or a data correction)

Period	Violation	Contaminant / rule	Health-based	Status
July 1, 2009 – September 30, 2009	Maximum Contaminant Level Violation, Average	TTHM	Health-based	Resolved
April 1, 2009 – June 30, 2009	Maximum Contaminant Level Violation, Average	TTHM	Health-based	Resolved
January 1, 2009 – June 30, 2017	Follow-up Or Routine LCR Tap M/R	Lead and Copper Rule	—	Resolved
January 1, 2009 – March 31, 2009	Maximum Contaminant Level Violation, Average	TTHM	Health-based	Resolved
September 1, 2007 – September 30, 2007	Maximum Contaminant Level Violation, Monthly (TCR)	Coliform (TCR)	Health-based	Archived
January 1, 2007 – March 31, 2007	Maximum Contaminant Level Violation, Average	TTHM	Health-based	Resolved
July 1, 2006 – September 30, 2006	Monitoring and Reporting (DBP)	TTHM	—	Resolved
July 1, 2006 – September 30, 2006	Maximum Contaminant Level Violation, Average	TTHM	Health-based	Resolved
July 1, 2006 – September 30, 2006	Monitoring and Reporting (DBP)	Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)	—	Resolved
April 1, 2006 – June 30, 2006	Maximum Contaminant Level Violation, Average	TTHM	Health-based	Resolved
January 1, 2006 – March 31, 2006	Maximum Contaminant Level Violation, Average	TTHM	Health-based	Resolved
October 1, 2005 – December 31, 2005	Maximum Contaminant Level Violation, Average	TTHM	Health-based	Resolved
July 1, 2005 – September 30, 2005	Maximum Contaminant Level Violation, Average	TTHM	Health-based	Resolved
April 1, 2005 – June 30, 2005	Maximum Contaminant Level Violation, Average	TTHM	Health-based	Resolved
January 1, 2005 – March 31, 2005	Maximum Contaminant Level Violation, Average	TTHM	Health-based	Resolved
January 1, 2005 – June 30, 2017	Follow-up Or Routine LCR Tap M/R	Lead and Copper Rule	—	Resolved
October 1, 2004 – December 31, 2004	Maximum Contaminant Level Violation, Average	TTHM	Health-based	Resolved
July 1, 2002 – July 21, 2013	Consumer Confidence Report Inadequate Reporting	Consumer Confidence Rule	—	Resolved
October 19, 1999 – July 21, 2013	Consumer Confidence Report Complete Failure to Report	Consumer Confidence Rule	—	Resolved
January 1, 1998 – December 31, 1998	Monitoring, Regular	Nitrate	—	Archived

Resolved addressed and confirmed by the stateArchived closed in EPA's records (typically due to age or a data correction)

Enforcement actions

June 30, 2017State Compliance achieved2 linked violations
July 21, 2013State Intentional no-action2 linked violations
January 1, 2010State Compliance achieved3 linked violations
October 23, 2009State Violation/Reminder Notice1 linked violation
October 23, 2009State Public Notification requested1 linked violation
August 27, 2009State Violation/Reminder Notice1 linked violation
July 28, 2009State Public Notification received2 linked violations
July 7, 2009State Public Notification requested1 linked violation
April 30, 2009State Public Notification received1 linked violation
October 18, 2007State Public Notification received2 linked violations
September 21, 2007State Violation/Reminder Notice2 linked violations
September 5, 2007State Compliance achieved11 linked violations
April 26, 2007State Public Notification received1 linked violation
April 16, 2007State Violation/Reminder Notice3 linked violations
December 19, 2006State Compliance Meeting conducted3 linked violations
October 31, 2006State Public Notification received6 linked violations
October 23, 2006State Public Notification requested3 linked violations
July 17, 2006State Public Notification received3 linked violations
April 25, 2006State Public Notification received1 linked violation
April 17, 2006State Violation/Reminder Notice1 linked violation
April 17, 2006State Public Notification requested1 linked violation
January 17, 2006State Violation/Reminder Notice1 linked violation
January 17, 2006State Public Notification requested1 linked violation
November 8, 2005State Public Notification received3 linked violations
September 13, 2005State Public Notification received15 linked violations
August 25, 2005State Public Notification requested1 linked violation
August 25, 2005State Violation/Reminder Notice2 linked violations
August 25, 2005State Public Notification requested2 linked violations
August 16, 2005State Violation/Reminder Notice5 linked violations
April 15, 2005State Violation/Reminder Notice1 linked violation
April 15, 2005State Public Notification requested7 linked violations
February 16, 2005State Public Notification received2 linked violations
January 26, 2005State Public Notification requested1 linked violation
August 13, 2004State Compliance achievedgeneral compliance action — not tied to a specific violation on record
February 15, 1983State Violation/Reminder Noticegeneral compliance action — not tied to a specific violation on record
April 15, 1982State Violation/Reminder Noticegeneral compliance action — not tied to a specific violation on record
March 15, 1982State Violation/Reminder Noticegeneral compliance action — not tied to a specific violation on record
August 15, 1981State Unresolved1 linked violation
August 15, 1981State Violation/Reminder Noticegeneral compliance action — not tied to a specific violation on record
July 15, 1981State Violation/Reminder Noticegeneral compliance action — not tied to a specific violation on record
April 15, 1981State Unresolvedgeneral compliance action — not tied to a specific violation on record
March 15, 1981State Violation/Reminder Noticegeneral compliance action — not tied to a specific violation on record
November 15, 1980State Violation/Reminder Noticegeneral compliance action — not tied to a specific violation on record

Common questions

Is TOMOKA VIEW ESTATES required to publish a Consumer Confidence Report?: Yes. TOMOKA VIEW ESTATES is a community water system, and federal rules (40 CFR 141 Subpart O) require every community water system to publish a Consumer Confidence Report each year.
When is TOMOKA VIEW ESTATES’s next Consumer Confidence Report due?: TOMOKA VIEW ESTATES’s next Consumer Confidence Report is due by July 1, 2027. The report covers calendar year 2026.
Does TOMOKA VIEW ESTATES have any open drinking water violations on record?: As of August 1, 2026, EPA's federal records show no open violations for TOMOKA VIEW ESTATES.
What is a Consumer Confidence Report?: A Consumer Confidence Report (CCR) is the annual drinking water quality report that community water systems must provide to the people they serve. It lists the contaminants detected in the system’s water during the year, where the water comes from, and how the results compare with federal limits. EPA’s revised CCR rule takes effect January 1, 2027, and the first reports in the new format are due July 1, 2027.

Contact

FLORIDA GOVERNMENTAL UTILITY AUTHORITY

407-629-6900

ORLANDO, FL 32819